Search Results for "Forest (Conservation) Act"

199 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 199 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Santiniketan Construction Case - Appellants Wins Against Demolition Order - High Court's Direction for Demolition and Compensation Set Aside

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Appellants challenging the High Court's order directing demolition of their building in Santiniketan ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Office Memorandum Allowing Post Facto CRZ Clearance for Permissible Activities. Environmental Organization Contended That the 2021 Circular Contravenes Mandatory Prior Clearance Requirement Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

The present Public Interest Litigation invoked the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows MMRDA to Construct Metro Line-5 Over Mangroves Subject to Compensatory Plantation. Public Interest Project Overrides CRZ Restrictions Under PIL Directions.

The petitioner, Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA), a statutory body under the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows State's Revision Against Sessions Court's Reversal of Cognizance in Wildlife Offence Case. Trial Court's Order Taking Cognizance Under Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 and Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 Restored as Sessions Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction.

The State of Karnataka, represented by the State Public Prosecutor, filed a criminal revision petition under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Crimi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Regulation Zone Notification for Versova Mangroves — No Violation of CRZ Norms Found. Court held that the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 was issued after due consideration of all relevant factors and did not violate the CRZ Notification, 2011.

The present Public Interest Litigation was filed by 14 petitioners, including residents of Versova, Mumbai, and the Jai Bharat Cooperative Housing Soc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Over Reinstatement for Daily Wage Employee in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Refusal of reinstatement and back wages upheld as employee worked only for 4 years and compensation of Rs. 25,000 deemed adequate under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Jagdish s/o Karuji Bombarde, was a daily wage employee of the Municipal Council, Tumsar. He was appointed in February 1997, transferre...