Search Results for "Expeditious trial"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Expeditious trial"

578 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 578 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Appellant in Crypto Currency Economic Offence Case — Explains Scope of Section 437(6) CrPC. Right to bail under Section 437(6) is not indefeasible; Magistrate retains discretion to refuse bail by recording reasons, but application must be considered liberally where delay is not attributable to accused.

24 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court allowed an appeal against the denial of regular bail by the Chhattisgarh High Court in a case involving a crypto currency economic o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Revision and Writ Petition in Property Dispute. Trial Court's Refusal to Allow Recall of Witness and Amendment of Plaint Upheld as No Jurisdictional Error or Material Irregularity Found.

19 Dec 2022

The judgment arises from a property dispute between the Plaintiffs (Jitendra Velji Faria and another) and the Defendants, including the Municipal Corp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination on Section 164 CrPC Statements in POCSO Case — Trial Court's Unilateral Exhibition of Statements Without Opportunity to Cross-Examine Violates Fair Trial Principles. Accused entitled to recall witnesses for cross-examination on their Section 164 statements to ensure fair trial.

23 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Vinod s/o Vikram Paithankar, is facing trial in Special Case (child) No. 10 of 2018 for offences under Sections 376(2)(i), 323 read wi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision and Quash Petitions in Corruption Case Against RTO Officials. Prima Facie Case Exists Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Based on Trap and Recovery of Bribe.

13 Mar 2020

The judgment pertains to two connected petitions arising from Special Case No.35/2015 pending before the Principal District and Sessions Judge and Spe...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Withdrawal of Criminal Complaint Due to Petitioner's Terminal Illness and Non-Prosecution. Petitioner suffering from nasopharyngeal cancer permitted to withdraw complaint and quash FIR under Section 482 CrPC as continuation would be abuse of process.

22 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Ravinder Chohan, a UK resident suffering from nasopharyngeal cancer, filed a criminal complaint in 2015 against respondents 2 to 5 all...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Liberal Approach to Amendment Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Upheld. The court held that the test of due diligence must be applied liberally, especially when the amendment is sought before trial and no prejudice is caused to the opposite party.

19 Jan 2016

The petitioners, Antonio Braganza and Aldila Braganza, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 22.07.2015 passed by the learned Adhoc Senior...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Amendment of Plaint in Property Suit — Liberal Approach to Amendment Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Upheld. The court set aside the trial court's rejection of amendment application, holding that due diligence must be assessed reasonably and not mechanically.

19 Jan 2016

The petitioners, Antonio Braganza and Aldila Braganza, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 22.07.2015 passed by the learned Adhoc Senior...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants' Cross-Examination in Civil Suit, Setting Aside Trial Court's Order Rejecting Permission as Abuse of Process. Right to Cross-Examine Witness Is a Valuable Right That Cannot Be Denied Without Considering Sufficient Cause for Delay.

23 Jun 2014

The petitioners, who were defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.13 of 2013 pending before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Zari-Jamni, District Yavatmal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements. Dishonour of Cheque Complaint Quashed as Notice of Demand Was Not Served Within 15 Days of Receipt of Information of Dishonour as Required Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

22 Dec 2006

The applicant, Smt. Ramilaben Trikamlal Shah, filed a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 agains...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Recusal Plea in Habeas Corpus Challenge to Contempt Detention; Holds Embarrassment and Alleged Error Insufficient for Judicial Withdrawal. Non-compliance of court's directions in contempt proceedings led to detention under Articles 129 and 142, and the bench ruled that allegations of bias were unfounded and did not necessitate recusal.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court was seized of a criminal writ petition filed by Subrata Roy Sahara challenging an order dated 04.03.2014 passed by the same bench in...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)