Search Results for "Disputed Claims"

4253 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4253 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Tender Cancellation in Public Procurement Case — State's Decision to Cancel Tender Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The appeal arose from a High Court order dismissing a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a tender by the State. The appellant, a bidder, co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Setting Aside Compensation Levy in Construction Contract Dispute. Levy of Compensation Under Clause 2 of GCC Invalid for Non-Compliance with Contractual Mechanism of Show Cause Notice and Quantification.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising from a construction contract between the General Manager, Heavy Water Plant (Manuguru) (petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints Against Hospital. The Court held that the Industrial Court correctly declined jurisdiction when the employer-employee relationship was disputed due to contract labour claims, following Supreme Court precedents.

The litigation arose out of writ petitions filed by a group of workers (Aayas and Ward Boys) challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Territorial Jurisdiction Determined by Claimant's Residence Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. MACT Aurangabad had jurisdiction as claimant resided within its territorial limits, despite accident occurring elsewhere.

The appellant, Navnath s/o Shripati Bhawar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accident Claims...