Search Results for "Clerical Error"

316 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 316 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice and Assessment Order Found to Be Identical, Indicating Non-Application of Mind by Adjudicating Authority.

The petitioner, a private limited company, challenged an assessment order dated 31 March 2023 passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against NCLT Order Refusing Recall of CIRP Admission Order. Recall Application Under Rule 11 of NCLT Rules, 2016 Not Maintainable as It Seeks Review of Merits, Not Correction of Clerical Error or Fraud.

The appellant, RCC E-Construct Pvt. Ltd., filed a Company Appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows BEST and EVEY Appeals in Electric Bus Tender Dispute. Tender Condition Requiring 200 Km Range in Actual Conditions Upheld as Valid and Non-Arbitrary.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by BEST and EVEY Trans Pvt. Ltd. and set aside the Bombay High Court's order dated 05.07.2022. The dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Review Petition in Service Matter — No Error Apparent on Record. Second review petition not maintainable as it seeks re-agitation of issues already decided, and no grounds under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC exist.

The petitioner, Anand Prabhakar Joshi, a former employee of the Bank of Maharashtra, filed a second review petition before the Bombay High Court seeki...