Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5006 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5006 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Injunction Order in Pledge Dispute, Upholds Ad-Interim Relief Despite Delay in Pronouncement. Delay of Over One Year in Passing Interlocutory Order Does Not Automatically Vitiate It Unless Prejudice Is Demonstrated.

The case involves three commercial appeals filed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging an order dated 5 June 2023 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Slum Rehabilitation Tenement Dispute. Court holds that Trial Court erred in not considering balance of convenience and irreparable loss while rejecting injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The appellants, Fayzan Khan, Devendra Mishra, Firoz Ismail Khan, and Rajesh Kanojiya, filed a suit in the City Civil Court at Dindoshi seeking a decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Decree for Deficit Court Fee Recovery. Appellants' suit for declaration of title and injunction dismissed for failure to pay proper court fee on market value of property.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of an immovable property. The trial cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005

The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interim Award on Limitation in Commercial Arbitration. Winding Up Proceedings Constitute Civil Proceedings for Exclusion of Time Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The dispute arose from a purchase order dated 24 June 2013 placed by Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. (petitioner) on Inspira IT Products Pvt. Ltd. (res...