Search Results for "Chief Controlling Revenue Authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Chief Controlling Revenue Authority"

258 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 258 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Stamp Duty Dispute — Single Mortgage Deed Covering Multiple Loan Agreements Constitutes One Instrument Under Section 4 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Revisional Authority's Order Levying Deficit Stamp Duty and Penalty Quashed as Loan Agreements Were Ancillary to Principal Mortgage Deed.

23 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Neepa Real Estates Pvt. Ltd., and its group company Sheth Creators Pvt. Ltd., engaged in real estate, sought financial assistance from...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Court Fee on Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Payable Under Article 4 of Schedule I of Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Appeal is a memorandum of appeal, not an application, thus ad valorem fee applies.

25 Apr 2016

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an order dated 28.08.2015 passed under Sectio...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Imposed on Mining Operations — Petitions Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Seek to Declare Notification Ultra Vires and Quash Demand Notices. The petitioners contended that Section 98A of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and the Notification dated 16.08.2008 were unconstitutional and not applicable to mining leases on non-forest lands.

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry association challenging th...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Refund of Excess Stamp Duty Paid by Company in Stamp Duty Refund Case — Respondents Directed to Refund Rs.10,11,810/- with Interest. Petitioner Entitled to Refund Under Section 48 of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 as Claim Was Within Limitation and Excess Payment Admitted.

22 Aug 2017

The petitioner, Dalmiya Cement Venture Limited, a public limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, got registered several lands...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Delivers Common Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Against State of Maharashtra and Forest Authorities Concerning Land Rights. The Petitioners Challenge Actions of the Revenue and Forest Departments Regarding Classification and Possession of Lands.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Notification Dated 16.08.2008 Imposing Forest Development Tax. Validity of Notification Questioned on Grounds of Legislative Competence and Consistency with Central Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Marking of Sale Deed in Execution Proceedings Despite Pending Registration — Distinction Between Registration and Admissibility Under Evidence Act. The court held that a certified copy of a sale deed can be marked as an exhibit even if the original is pending registration for under-valuation, subject to the provisions of the Stamp Act and Registration Act.

2 Jul 2015

The petitioners, Sri C. Chinnappa and Chandrashekar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an orde...

High Court

KAHC010479002008_1

3 Dec 2015

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a consolidated batch of writ petitions filed by various entities including National Mineral Development ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Directing Registration of BIFR Orders Under Registration Act, 1908 for Property Transfer by Operation of Law. BIFR orders sanctioning a scheme of revival-cum-demerger under SICA Act are documents affecting immovable property and require registration under Section 17(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908; refusal to register on ground of non-exemption is not justified.

6 May 2026

The Petitioner, Swayam Realtors & Traders LLP, originally a company under the Companies Act, 1956 and later converted into an LLP under the Limited Li...

11 12 13 14 15

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)