WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012
2 Apr 2013The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...
Search Results for "Cabinet decision"
395 result(s) found
Found 395 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court Orders in Separation of Powers and Contempt Case Due to Judicial Overreach and Abuse of Process. High Court Lacked Power to Direct Notification of Rules Under Article 229 of Constitution and Improperly Initiated Criminal Contempt for Legal Challenges, Violating Principles of Separation of Powers and Legal Remedies.
3 Jan 2024The appeals arose from two orders of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 4 April 2023 and 19 April 2023. The factual...
- 192
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petition by Union of India for Mandatory Army NOC near Colaba Military Station — Security Concerns Over Adarsh Building Construction. The petition sought demolition of the Adarsh Cooperative Housing Society building for lack of security clearance from the Defence Department as required for constructions near military installations.
29 Apr 2016This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the Union of India through the Indian Army seeking a mandamus to restrain the St...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds State's Power to Appoint CEOs Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Rules, 2014 — Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointments Quashed. The court held that the appointments were valid under Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Appointment of Chief Executive Officer) Rules, 2014 and the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.
27 Dec 2016The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) which set ...
- 169
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Grant of Alewadi Port Project to Third Party Under Maharashtra Maritime Board Policies. Petitioner Alleges Arbitrary Treatment and Non-Consideration of Original Proposal Contrary to Port Policies.
13 Oct 2017The dispute concerns the development of a multipurpose port at Alewadi in Maharashtra under the state's port policies. Petitioner, a UK-based private ...
- 65
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds 2020 Tribunal Rules with Modifications to Ensure Judicial Independence. Court directs changes to Search-cum-Selection Committee composition and member qualifications to align with constitutional principles.
27 Nov 2020The Supreme Court of India was called upon to decide the constitutional validity of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualificat...
- 198
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Order Granting Pensionary Benefits to Employees of Autonomous Society. Denial of Pension Does Not Violate Article 14 as Employees of Society Registered Under Societies Registration Act, 1860 Are Not Similarly Situated to Government Employees Under Specific Service Rules Excluding Pension.
10 Jan 2022The dispute arose from the State of Maharashtra's refusal to extend pensionary benefits to employees of the Water and Land Management Institute (WALMI...
- 578
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Periodical Promotion Scheme Benefits from 1994 for Non-Teaching Employees. Discrimination in Implementation of G.R. dated 12th July 2004 Quashed as Arbitrary.
11 Jul 2017The Petitioners, nine Class 'C' and 'D' non-teaching employees of various educational institutions in Sangli and Satara districts, filed a writ petiti...
- 61
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Part, Upholds Quashing of Government Order Including Dargah as Religious Institution Under Karnataka Education Act. Court Remits for Reconsideration Without High Level Committee Report, Emphasizing Natural Justice and Independent Application of Mind by Government.
6 Mar 2023The case involves a writ appeal filed by Syed Ghouse Mohiyuddin Shah Khadri, the Sajjada Nasheen of Hazrath Dada Hayeth Meer Kalandar Dargah in Chikka...
- 122
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Himachal Pradesh's Appointment of Teachers Under Special Schemes Due to Non-Availability of Qualified Candidates and Long Service. The Court held that appointments made under the PAT Scheme, Para Teachers Policy, and Gram Vidya Upasak Yojna were not illegal as they were necessitated by topographical conditions and lack of qualified teachers, and the State could regularise their services.
17 Apr 2020The case pertains to the validity of appointments of teachers under three special schemes framed by the Government of Himachal Pradesh: the Himachal P...
- 365
