Search Results for "Buldana District Order"

196 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 196 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Father's Petition Challenging Maintenance Enhancement to Daughter Under Section 127 CrPC — Held That Enhancement Requires Proof of Change in Circumstances and Daughter's Inability to Maintain Herself

The petitioner, Sk. Chand, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the judgment of the Sessions Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Discharge Application in Dowry Death Case. Dying Declaration and Presumption Under Section 113-B of Evidence Act Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.

The present criminal revision application was filed by Appasaheb @ Eknath Nago Salunke, the husband of the deceased Kirti, challenging the order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Caste Certificates of Students in MBBS/BDS Courses — Violation of Natural Justice as No Show-Cause Notice or Opportunity of Hearing Given Before Cancellation.

The petitioners, 27 students who had secured admission to MBBS/BDS courses in various colleges, challenged the orders passed by the Scrutiny Committee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Allowing Examination of Power of Attorney Holder Before Plaintiff in Defamation Suit. No Prejudice or Abuse of Process Found as Trial Court's Discretion Was Properly Exercised Under Order XVIII Rule 3A CPC.

The petitioners, defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 17/2013 for defamation, challenged the trial court's order allowing the respondent-plaintiff to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Appeal Dismissed in Default Due to Advocate's Absence, Imposing Costs on Appellants. Mistake of Advocate Should Not Prejudice Party; Section 5 of Limitation Act Applied to Advance Substantial Justice.

The appellants, Devkisan Onkardas Bhutada and Gopal Devkisan Bhutada, had filed Regular Civil Appeal No. 80/08 against the judgment and decree in Regu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit Due to Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts regarding joint family property and limitation cannot be interfered with under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Madhusudan Vishwanath Mule, filed a second appeal against the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge Junior Division at Malkapur dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 4574 OF 2026

...