Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2656 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2656 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Disputes Arising from Contract Dated 27.09.2013.

The petitioner, Sobha Projects and Trade Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Holds that BSA governed by Benin law with foreign seat cannot be brought under Part I of Arbitration Act, and issue estoppel applies due to dismissal of anti-arbitration injunction.

The Supreme Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by Balaji Steel Trade under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Extension of Arbitral Mandate Under Section 29-A of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. District Court's Appointment of Sole Arbitrator Upheld as Petitioner's Non-Participation Caused Delay.

The Petitioner, M/s. Magnum Opus IT consulting Private Limited, a company engaged in e-governance, challenged an order dated 03/02/2021 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court sets aside award for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider counterclaims.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising out of the same arbitral award. The petitioners (original respondents) challenged the award un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of contractual clauses was plausible and not patently illegal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd., entered into a contract with the respondent, Jai Laxmi Constructions Engineers An...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent Act in Arbitration Petition. Court Holds That Cause of Action for Section 9 Petition Arises Where Arbitration Agreement Is Situated, Not Where Interim Relief Is Sought.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who allowed Chamber Summons No. 905 of 2013 filed by Respondent...