Search Results for "Adjournments"

326 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 326 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Ex Parte Order in Inter-State Dispute Over THDC Shareholding. State of Uttar Pradesh Ordered to Pay Costs of Rs. 30 Lakhs for Delay in Appearance.

The Supreme Court dealt with an application by the State of Uttar Pradesh to recall an ex parte order dated 16.12.2013 in a suit filed by the State of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Judgment Debtor's Writ Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Right to Argue in Execution Proceedings. Repeated Adjournments and Non-Compliance with Cost Order Justify Forfeiture Under Order 21 CPC.

The petitioner, Robert Meghraj Wanjari, was the judgment debtor in Special Summary Suit No.1 of 2010, where a decree was passed against him. He filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal in NI Act Case Due to Denial of Adjournment — Trial Court's Rejection of Adjournment Without Considering Advocate's Engagement Violated Principles of Natural Justice

The applicant, Dhule Shahar Kirana va Bhusar Vyapari Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, through its representative Suresh Sahebrao Jadhav, filed a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for Non-Prosecution. Court Holds That Dismissal in Default and Acquittal of Accused Without Considering Merits Is Not Sustainable When Complainant's Counsel Was Present.

The applicant, Murlidhar s/o Harkisandas Manwani, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Want of Prosecution — Technical Dismissal Not on Merits. The court held that dismissal under Section 256 CrPC is not a bar to appeal as it is not a decision on merits.

The applicant, Terna Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Prosecution. Applicant Failed to Appear Despite Multiple Opportunities, Leading to Dismissal of Revision Under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Parmanand Aggarwal challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrumen...