Search Results for "property title dispute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "property title dispute"

4814 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4814 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Plaintiff's Prescriptive Title in Property Dispute — Continuous Possession for Over 30 Years Establishes Ownership Under Limitation Act, 1963. Adverse Possession Claim Succeeds as Defendants Fail to Prove Their Ownership or Possession of Survey No.85/1.

31 Mar 2005

The dispute concerns a property admeasuring about 6225 sq. metres, surveyed under No.85/1 as 'Shristhal' in Poinguinim village, Canacona Taluka, Goa. ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Tribunal Order in Senior Citizens Act Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. Tribunal Granted Police Protection Without Applicant Being a Senior Citizen Under Section 2(h) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

20 Jul 2026

The petitioner, a daughter-in-law, challenged an order dated 02-07-2024 passed by the Assistant Commissioner and Chairman of the Maintenance and Welfa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

30 Nov -0001

The present second appeal arises out of a civil suit for declaration of ownership and permanent injunction filed by the original plaintiffs (now appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. First Appellate Court Failed to Independently Re-Appreciate Evidence, Rendering Its Judgment Perverse and Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

30 Nov -0001

The present matter involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the appellants, Bhagirathibai and Wanmala, and the respondents,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Perversity in Awarding Damages for Breach of Agreement for Sale of Land. The court found that the arbitral tribunal failed to consider mitigation of damages and made a perverse computation of damages based on an incorrect price per acre.

8 Jul 2022

The case involves a commercial appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Jagannath Parmeshwar Mills Private Limi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order of Senior Citizens Tribunal in Maintenance Case Due to Absence of Jurisdictional Fact. Tribunal Lacked Jurisdiction as Applicant Was Not a Senior Citizen Under Section 2(h) and the Relief Sought Fell Outside the Ambit of Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

20 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by Smt. Deepa, daughter-in-law of respondent No.3 Smt. Sulochana, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Port Trust for Refusing Remission of Demurrage Charges. Port Trust's Own Guidelines for Remission When Detention by Customs for Bonafide Operations Must Be Followed.

12 Apr 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Rasiklal Kantilal & Co., a partnership firm engaged in import of goods including zinc ingots and copper wire bars, filed a writ p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order to Implead Plaintiff in Suit for Specific Performance — Petitioner Not a Necessary Party Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC. Subsequent purchaser pendente lite cannot claim impleadment as a matter of right; decree binds all persons claiming under vendor.

13 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Lakshmamma, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.07.2013 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Waqf Board Eviction Order — C.E.O. Lacks Power to Decide Title Under Section 54 of Waqf Act, 1995. The court held that the Chief Executive Officer cannot adjudicate title disputes and must relegate parties to the Waqf Tribunal under Section 83 of the Waqf Act, 1995.

17 Feb 2015

The applicant, Ishtaque Ali Sayyad Ali, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 83(2) of the Waqf Act, 1995 challenging an order dated 16th M...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — No Prima Facie Case Made Out for Interim Relief. The court held that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for grant of temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC as the agreement of sale was unregistered and the claim appeared stale.

23 Nov 2024

The appellant, M/s. Gaurav Rose Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., filed a miscellaneous first appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 190...

127 128 129 130 131

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)