Search Results for "agreement purchaser"

1907 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1907 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Ad-Interim Injunction in Property Dispute — Holds That Trial Court Must Consider Documents Prima Facie and That Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act Does Not Substitute Injunction

The appellant, Durga Bearing (Mumbai) Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against the order of the City Civil Court, Dindoshi, Mumbai, dated 10 August 2016, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Union of India in Arbitration Dispute — Claim for Excess Timber Supply Held to Be Within Scope of Arbitration Clause. Recourse to Contract Necessary to Determine Claim, Confirming Arbitral Jurisdiction Under Arbitration Act, 1940.

The appeal arose from a contract between the Union of India and Salween Timber Construction (India) for the supply of teak logs. A dispute emerged whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Appellants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Service of Summons.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of a contract filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellants/defendants. The trial cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Yahoo India Pvt. Ltd. for Lack of Creditor-Debtor Relationship. Petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as disputed debt arises from tripartite arrangement without privity between petitioner and respondent.

The petitioner, Inflow Technologies Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 against Yahoo India P...