Search Results for "PW1"

2758 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2758 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as dying declaration and eyewitness testimony found contradictory and inconsistent.

The present appeal was instituted by the appellants-accused, Dnyaneshwar Arjun Bhagwat (A-1) and Arjun Sakhahari Bhagwat (A-2), against the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Credible Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 324 read with Section 34 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons (Namdeo Haribhau Dayare, Sau. Malu Dyaneshwar Uike, Girish Uttamrao Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Credible Evidence. Acquittal of Accused Under Sections 302, 324 read with Section 34 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of four accused persons (Namdeo Haribhau Dayare, Sau. Malu Dyaneshwar Uike, Girish Uttamrao Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder by Strangulation with Belt — Altercation Over Trivial Issue Leads to Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as evidence of last seen together and voluntary confession established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Rakesh Dattatray Rindhe, was convicted by the District Judge-12 and Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 120 of 2014 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case — Revisional Court Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Unless Perverse. Accused failed to rebut presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 regarding legally enforceable debt.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (Smt. Y.C. Manju) against the revision petitioner (Sunil Yadav) under Section 138 of the Nego...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement Due to Failure to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Appellants failed to demonstrate financial capacity and timely performance under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appellants, Hemant M. Deshmukh, Ashok Varma, and Gyanchand D. Oswal, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 21/12/199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Rajaram s/o Tulshiram Mane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Omerga, in Special Case (NDPS) No. 03 of 2008 for an offence punishable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC — Demand of Rs. 5,000 and Gold Tola Constitutes Cruelty. The court held that the evidence of witnesses established the demand and cruelty, and the acquittal of co-accused does not affect the appellant's conviction.

The appellant, Jaihind Sitaram Khale, was convicted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, in Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Accounts and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Popat @ Bhujangrao Bhausaheb Mahurkar, Sou. Vandana Popat Mahurkar, and Kum. Meena Bhausaheb Mahurkar, were convicted by the V Ad-hoc ...