Search Results for "Kerala Act"

4115 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4115 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish essential ingredients.

The case involves two appeals against the judgment of the Special Court, Khamgaon, convicting the appellants under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim in Payment of Gratuity Act Case — Resignation Not Ground for Forfeiture. Forfeiture of gratuity under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 requires termination for misconduct causing damage; resignation does not justify forfeiture.

The petitioner, H. Jayarama Shetty, joined the respondent Sangli Bank Ltd. on 28 May 1991. On 3 May 1994, a show cause notice was issued regarding irr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in MSMED Act Arbitration Challenge — Pre-Deposit Must Include Interest. Section 19 of MSMED Act mandates 75% deposit of entire award amount, including compound interest, and Single Judge's order restricting deposit to principal was erroneous.

The case involves an appeal by M/s.Unicon Engineers, the respondent in an arbitration petition, against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Madr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Dismissal of Election Petition in Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act for Delay. Condonation of Delay Not Permissible as Act Contains No Enabling Provision, and Limitation Act, 1963 is Excluded.

The writ petition arose from an order of the District Court dismissing an election petition and a concomitant application for condonation of delay. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Two-Year Separation Period Under Section 10A of Indian Divorce Act, 1869. Court holds that the provision is not discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution as the period is reasonable and based on legislative policy.

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...