WRIT PETITION NO.2720 OF 2013
1 Oct 2014The writ petitions were filed by municipal employee unions and individuals challenging the legality and constitutional validity of provisions of the B...
Search Results for "Central Government employee"
2228 result(s) found
Found 2228 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employee's Petition for Correction of Date of Birth in Service Records Based on Matriculation Certificate. Employer's Refusal Set Aside as Arbitrary When Employee Consistently Used Correct Date in Subsequent Examinations and Transfers.
30 Jun 2021The petitioner, Prabhat Kumar Titus, was appointed as a Badli Loader in Western Coalfields Limited in 1984. His date of birth was recorded as 1st July...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
6 Oct 2020The appellant, Devidas s/o Harichandra Bhaskar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon on 26-11-2015 in Special (A.C.B.) Case No.13 o...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Partially Allows Writ Petition by Irrigation Department Officers Against Tribunal's Order of Full Back Wages. Back Wages Set Aside for Lack of Enquiry into Gainful Employment; Liberty Granted for Fresh Enquiry into Misconduct.
3 Mar 2010The petitioners, officers of the Irrigation Department of Maharashtra, challenged the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 8.8.2005....
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Gratuity Dispute — BIFR Scheme Under SICA Overrides Payment of Gratuity Act. The court held that a rehabilitation scheme sanctioned by BIFR under SICA is binding on all employees and the employer's payment of gratuity as per the scheme constitutes a valid discharge of its liability under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
24 Jun 2016The writ petition was filed by Suryakant Ramchandra Mahadik, an erstwhile employee of Khatau Makanji Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd., challenging an a...
- 70
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Operational Creditor Seeking Performance Pay Under IBC — Claim for Performance Pay Not an 'Operational Debt' Under Section 5(21) of IBC, 2016 as It Is Discretionary and Not Based on Provision of Goods or Services.
30 Nov -0001The appeal was filed by M. Ramakanth, an operational creditor, against the order of the National Company Law Tribunal, Hyderabad, which dismissed his ...
- 89
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Driver Upheld, Multiplier Applied Correctly. The Court enhanced compensation from Rs.15,47,000 to Rs.18,47,000 by adding future prospects and applying multiplier 18 under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
22 Feb 2023The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the parents of the deceased, Samilulla and Ashrafunisa, seeking compensation for the dea...
- 107
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Landlord's Application for Possession and Rent Arrears from Official Liquidator in Company Liquidation. Landlord's Claim for Rent Arrears and Possession Upheld Under Section 476 of Companies Act, 1956.
30 Jun 2022The applicant, Shri N R Ravi, claimed to be the owner of a property leased to M/s. SEM India Systems Private Limited (in liquidation) on 15.05.2008. T...
- 134
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Bank Employees' Union; Quashes Recall Order Denying Compensation. Employees Who Opted for Voluntary Retirement Before Bank Liquidation Held Entitled to Payment as Employment Relationship Continues Until Full Settlement.
10 Mar 2017This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a trade union representing 55 employees of Solapur Nagari Audyogic Saha...
- 84
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Banning Order Issued by Public Sector Undertaking – Allegations of Blacklisting Without Proper Notice and Violation of Fundamental Rights. Petitioner Contends That Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Intention to Ban for Three Years, Rendering Order Arbitrary.
27 Oct 2016The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a private limited company engaged in corrosion resistant coating applica...
- 49
