Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Arbitration petition"

2786 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2786 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Procedural Order on Discovery — Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Permit Challenge to Procedural Orders, Only Final Awards.

18 Nov 2010

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Tata Industries Limited and another against Gras...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 34 Petition Despite Arbitration at Calcutta Due to Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses. Parties Bound by Agreement Conferring Exclusive Jurisdiction on Mumbai Courts Over All Disputes.

19 Dec 2012

The petitioner, ISE Securities & Services Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cooperative Bank Dispute — Upholds Tribunal's Finding That Petitioner Was Not Entitled to Be Heard Before Enquiry Report Was Tabled. The court held that the principles of natural justice were not violated as the petitioner was given an opportunity to respond after the report was placed before the Board.

5 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Nazim H. Kazi, was a member of the respondent, Kokan Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd., since 1986 and served as its Chairman from 25th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Winding Up Orders in Company Law Dispute — Failure to Discharge Debt and Lack of Bona Fide Dispute Justify Winding Up Under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the appellants had no genuine dispute regarding the debt and the winding up petitions were maintainable.

9 Mar 2016

The judgment pertains to three appeals filed by Neelkanth Devansh Developers Private Limited, Neelkanth Soham Developers Private Limited, and Neelkant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against MSEB Officials in Cheque Dishonour Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Specific Allegation of Role in Company Affairs. Court held that directors/officers of a company cannot be prosecuted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without specific averments that they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the company at the time of the offence.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed by officers of the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) seeking quashing of criminal proce...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in University Software Contract Dispute. Parties jointly request retired judge as arbitrator; Court appoints subject to Section 12 declarations and Fourth Schedule fees.

9 Jul 2019

The petitioner, Nirmal Software Services Pvt. Ltd., entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Railway's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Upholds Award of Refund and Damages for Breach of Contract. The court held that the arbitrator's findings were based on evidence and not perverse, and the award of damages beyond contractual refund was justified.

30 Jun 2011

The Union of India, acting through the Senior Divisional Commercial Manager of Western Railway, Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbit...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of joint venture agreement and rejection of counter claims as not perverse.

25 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Development Corporation of Konkan Limited, a government company, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Interlocutory Order Under Article 227 — Upholds Minimal Judicial Intervention in Arbitration Proceedings. The court held that Section 5 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 bars judicial intervention except as provided, and the petitioner could raise objections before the arbitrator or challenge the final award.

27 Mar 2026

The petitioner, M/S HKRP Innovations Ltd., through its authorized representative Vinesh Soni, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons to Arbitrator in Section 34 Proceedings — Arbitrator Not a Necessary Party Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator cannot be arrayed as defendant in arbitration suit challenging award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Sri H.N.M. Prasad, a practicing advocate, acted as an arbitrator and passed an arbitral award on 10.3.2015 in a dispute between Smt. V...

125 126 127 128 129

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)