Search Results for "municipal purpose"

4702 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4702 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lack of Title. Petitioners failed to prove ownership of the acquired land, and the acquisition was for a public purpose under the MRTP Act, 1966.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of certain lands in Kolhapur, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for road widening...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses BSNL's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation of Rs. 790 per sq. mtr. and Rent Upheld. Non-agricultural land within municipal limits valued justly under Section 126 of MRTP Act, with rent for prior possession from 1992 to 2002.

The appeal was filed by the Acquiring Body, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), against the judgment and award of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Bhoom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Octroi Levy on Goods Sent for Job Work Outside Municipal Limits. Goods sent for processing and returned as finished products are not liable to octroi under the Maharashtra Municipalities (Octroi) Rules, 1968.

The petitioners, Raymond Limited and Krishnamurthy Seetharaman, challenged a communication dated 5th November 1998 from the Thane Municipal Corporatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Eviction Notices under Slum Act in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Petitioners Challenged Eviction Notices Issued under Sections 33 and 38 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, Alleging Lack of Section 3C(1) Declaration.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by Om-Sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application Seeking Section 340 CrPC Proceedings in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute for Alleged Fabrication of MHADA Affidavit. Court Finds Affidavit Was Authentic, E-filed Under Administrative Directions, and Served on All Parties, Negating Claim of Fraud on Court.

The case involved two writ petitions challenging a slum rehabilitation scheme on MHADA land in Bandra East, Mumbai. The petitioners claimed to be MHAD...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears writ petitions challenging a caste validity certificate of 'Mochi' Scheduled Caste. Petitions allege forged documents and procedural irregularities in the scrutiny committee's order, but the final decision is not stated in the provided judgment extract.

The judgment before the Bombay High Court concerned three connected writ petitions arising from a dispute over the caste validity certificate of Miss ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Development Permission and Parking Agreement for Hotel Tunga Regency. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or public interest violation in the grant of development permission and leave and license agreement for public parking plot.

The petitioner, Sandeep Sharadchandra Thakur, claiming to be a social activist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...