Search Results for "third party challenge"

4214 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4214 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Specific Performance Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's discretion to deny specific performance and award damages instead, finding no grounds for interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Rolta India Ltd., challenged an arbitral award dated 8th December, 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Makes Rule Returnable in Writs Seeking Compliance with RBI Master Circular on Loan Restructuring. Petitioners Allege Inability to Comply with Loan Obligations Due to Telecom Industry Downturn, Seek Direction to Banks Under Paragraph 6.4 of RBI Master Circular Dated 1 July 2015.

The petitioner in Writ Petition No. 1893 of 2019, GTL Infrastructure Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Decree-Holders' Appeals Against Executing Court's Interim Stay Order in Execution Proceedings. Held That Executing Court Cannot Stay Execution Beyond Order XXI Rule 29 CPC and Must Follow Procedure Under Order XXI Rule 37 CPC Before Arrest.

The case involves appeals by the decree-holders (appellants) against an interim order dated 29th June 2018 passed by the Principal Sub-Judge, Kottayam...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...