Search Results for "statutory notice requirements"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "statutory notice requirements"

3709 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3709 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Affirming Removal of Mathadhipathi under A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. Leave granted in SLP against dismissal of challenge to removal based on enquiry report finding charges proved.

1 Jan 1970

The appeal arose from the removal of the Mathadhipathi of Sri Swamy Hathiramji Mutt, Tirupati, under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Under Article 226. High Court reversed Tribunal orders and granted relief; statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 argued to exclude writ jurisdiction.

1 Aug 2026

In these connected civil appeals, the Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Delayed Statutory Notice. Notice Issued 31 Days After Dishonour Exceeds 30-Day Limit Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Rendering Complaint Not Maintainable.

5 Mar 2015

The petitioner, Smt. M. Shashikala, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of the proce...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to MCGM's Condition Requiring No Objection Certificate from Indian Navy for Occupancy Certificate and Development Permission. Petitioners Argue That Imposition of Such Condition is Arbitrary and Without Statutory Sanction.

21 Jun 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. In Writ Petition No. 229 of 2018, M/s S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Suit — Whirlpool's Registered Designs for Washing Machine Held Prima Facie Valid and Infringed by Videocon's 'Pebble' Model. The Court found that the Defendant's product was a clear imitation of the Plaintiff's registered designs, and the Plaintiff made out a strong prima facie case for protection.

27 May 2014

The Plaintiff, Whirlpool of India Ltd., a subsidiary of Whirlpool Corporation, filed a suit for design infringement against Videocon Industries Ltd. T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Commercial Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Appeal Questions the Upholding of Arbitral Award Granting Remuneration and Indemnity Under Reconstitution Deed of Partnership Firm.

30 Apr 2026

The present Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Notice of Motion for Reference to Arbitration in Dispute Between Commodity Spot Exchange and Member. Defendant Exchange Seeks to Rely on Bye-Laws and Undertaking as Arbitration Agreement Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Sep 2014

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act — Procedural Irregularities in Notice Period and Meeting Conduct Render Motion Invalid. The court held that the mandatory 15-day notice period under Section 35 of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 was not complied with, and the meeting was not conducted properly, thus quashing the no-confidence motion.

8 Nov 2019

The petitioners, Indraraj Babulal Jaiswal and Sangitabai Laxman Shinde, were the Sarpanch and Deputy Sarpanch respectively of Grampanchayat Tembhurni....

123 124 125 126 127

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)