Search Results for "contradictory statement"

1663 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1663 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 read with Section 3 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The case involves three appellants: Ganesh @ Gorakh Tatyarao Jadhav (original accused No. 1), Muskan w/o Shaikh Rashid @ Rafiq (original accused No. 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction of Wife for Murder of Husband Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen theory and failure to explain death under Section 106 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 led to conviction under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Jaishree Devkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambejogai, for the murder of her husband Rajabhau Devkar under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dattatraya Laxman Bagdi, a Talathi working at Dundage, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadhinglaj, for offences under Sections 7 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit for Willful Default and Subletting. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Business Expansion Upheld as Trial Court and Appellate Court Concurrent Findings Not Disturbed Under Article 227.

The petitioner, Sou. Bhamabai, wife of Ananda Raut, was defendant no.3 in a suit for eviction filed by the landlords (respondent nos.1 and 2) against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Writ Petition Maintainable Against Sessions Judge's Order Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 Despite Finality Clause. Finality Clause Under Section 61G Does Not Bar Constitutional Remedy Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (FDCM), filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 01/08/2017 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Readiness and Willingness. Agreement of Sale with Possession and Part Payment Enforced Against Subsequent Purchaser Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 15.7.1987 between the plaintiff (first respondent) and the fir...