Search Results for "understanding consequences"

1244 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1244 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Judgment in Writ Petition for Refund of Interest Under Customs Act, 1962. Petition Seeks Refund of Interest Allegedly Illegally Recovered Without Issuing Notice Under Section 59(1) of the Customs Act.

The dispute arose from the import of spices by the petitioners, fourteen proprietary firms, who faced a refusal from the customs authorities to clear ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes Pending Applications and Show Cause Notices in Scheme of Compromise Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956. Criminal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Allowed to Continue Notwithstanding Sanction of Scheme.

The matter arose from a scheme of compromise and arrangement proposed by Europlast India Ltd. under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The unsecu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Customs Seizure of Imported Engine Oil for Alleged Undervaluation. Petitioner Challenges Investigation and Provisional Release Conditions Requiring Rs.6.7 Crores Bond and Rs.2 Crores Bank Guarantee Under Customs Act, 1962 and Customs Valuation Rules, 2007.

The petitioner, Indosheel Mould Limited, a company based in Coimbatore, imported Mercedes-Benz Engine Oil from Sinopec Lubricant (Singapore) Pte Ltd t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Consumer Protection Appointment Rules; Selection Committee Procedure Under Scrutiny. Court Considers Whether Rules Violate Article 14 and Supreme Court Directions in State of UP v. UP Consumer Protection Bar Association.

These two petitions challenged the Consumer Protection (Qualification for appointment, method of recruitment, procedure of appointment, term of office...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Declaration That Governor Must Act on Council of Ministers' Advice for Legislative Council Nominations. Article 171(5) Nomination Power Held to Be Non-Discretionary and Governor Bound by Aid and Advice of Council of Ministers.

The Bombay High Court, in this public interest litigation, examined the constitutional powers of the Governor to nominate members to the Maharashtra L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Suit for Specific Performance of Contract for Sale of Property at Bandra, Mumbai. Contractual Dispute Centers on Vendor's Obligation to Provide Vacant Possession and Marketable Title, and Validity of Sale of Minor's Share Without Court Permission.

Background: The suit pertains to a contract for sale of freehold land and structure at Bandra, Mumbai, entered into on 26 June 1993 between the plaint...