MISC. APPLICATION NO. 193 OF 2003
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "contract enforcement"
1695 result(s) found
Found 1695 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Leave Under Clause XII of Letters Patent, 1865 for Partition Suit Involving Immovable Property Outside Jurisdiction. Part of Cause of Action Within Jurisdiction Sufficient to Confer Jurisdiction Over Entire Suit.
11 Aug 2014The plaintiff, Jaspal Sawhney, filed a petition seeking leave under Clause XII of the Letters Patent, 1865 to file a suit (L) No. 494 of 2014 against ...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows SICOM Petition to Enforce Guarantee Liability Under State Financial Corporations Act, 1951. Guarantors' Defense of Discharge Due to Variation in Contract Rejected as Guarantees Were Continuing and No Material Alteration Occurred.
14 Nov 2014The petition was filed by SICOM Ltd., a State Financial Corporation, under Sections 31(1)(aa) and 32 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, se...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Case Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Award of Rs.1,26,46,303/- with Interest at 12% Per Annum. The court held that the arbitrator had applied his mind and there was no violation of natural justice or public policy.
23 Dec 2025The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Manmohan Bhimsen Goyal and Kavita Manmohan Goyal ...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation by Zilla Parishad — No Right to Claim Contract After Tender Cancellation. The Court held that a tenderer has no vested right to have a tender accepted and that the authority can cancel the tender process for valid reasons, including financial constraints.
7 Aug 2015The petitioners, a group of individuals and construction firms, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the d...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Gratuity Dispute — BIFR Scheme Under SICA Overrides Payment of Gratuity Act. The court held that a rehabilitation scheme sanctioned by BIFR under SICA is binding on all employees and the employer's payment of gratuity as per the scheme constitutes a valid discharge of its liability under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.
24 Jun 2016The writ petition was filed by Suryakant Ramchandra Mahadik, an erstwhile employee of Khatau Makanji Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd., challenging an a...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Exclusion of Counterclaim in Specific Performance Suit. Counterclaim Based on Void Minor's Agreement and Barred by Limitation Under Order VIII Rule 6-A CPC.
24 Jun 2016The petitioner, Abhishek Boke, original defendant No.1, challenged the order of the trial court dated 24.6.2016 allowing the application (Exh. No.86) ...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Council's Petitions Against Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Held that Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require a separate notice of retrenchment when the employee is already aware of the closure of the establishment.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by the Municipal Council, Tirora, and its President against common orders passed by the Labour C...
- 147
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Summary Suit Dispute Over Dishonoured Cheque — Triable Issues Raised Regarding Loan Repayment and Liability of Guarantors. Court sets aside summary judgment and grants unconditional leave to defend, holding that the appellants raised triable issues including whether the loan was repaid and whether the guarantors were discharged.
17 Dec 2016The case arises from a summary suit filed by Anthony Maharaj (respondent) against Morpheus Media Ventures Pvt. Ltd. and others (appellants) for recove...
- 127
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals by Apparel Companies Challenging Provident Fund Damages Order. Establishment of separate code number for each unit does not absolve liability under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
24 Jan 2013The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by apparel companies (M/s J.D. Clothing Company, M/s Gokaldas India, M/s Wear Craft Apparels, and others...
- 77
