Search Results for "Objects Clause"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Objects Clause"

2214 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2214 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case, Quashing Stay on Termination of Facilities Agreement. The Court held that Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, does not apply to a service recipient, and the NCLT's jurisdiction under Section 60(5)(c) does not extend to contractual termination disputes unrelated to insolvency resolution.

23 Nov 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal dated 24 June 2020, which upheld an interim order of the National Comp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Rejection of Plaints Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Barred by Limitation. Court holds that while considering an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, the court must look at the plaint averments alone and cannot rely on the written statement or other documents filed by the defendant.

9 Aug 2019

The judgment involves two writ petitions arising from orders of the trial court rejecting plaints under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure...

High Court

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 25700 OF 2025

9 Oct 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Admissions for Violation of RTE Act — Screening Test for Class V Admission Held Illegal Under Section 13(1) of Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. Pending Application for Specified Category Status Does Not Exempt School from Compliance.

19 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Jnana Prabodhini, a public charitable trust running a school, challenged an order dated 29 May 2013 passed by the Education Officer (S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assistant Professor's Challenge to Superannuation at Age 60, Holds AICTE Retirement Age of 65 Applicable to Private Self-Finance Standalone Institution. Goa Institute of Management's Faculty Manual Fixing Retirement Age at 60 is Overridden by AICTE Regulations.

13 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Dr. Vilasini Devi Nair, was appointed as an Assistant Professor at the Goa Institute of Management (GIM), a private self-finance stand...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

1 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Notice Against Developer in BBMP Dispute — Notice Issued Without Proper Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Court holds that Section 321 of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 requires a show-cause notice and opportunity of hearing before ordering demolition of alleged unauthorized construction.

1 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Emerald Haven Development Ltd, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Against Non-Signatory. Group of Companies Doctrine Not Applicable Without Evidence of Mutual Intention to Bind Non-Signatory Under Sections 47-49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a UAE company, filed an appeal under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act and Section 50 of the Arbitra...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Part in Foreign Award Enforcement Case, Remands for Consideration of Group of Companies Doctrine. The court held that the group of companies doctrine may bind a non-signatory to an arbitration agreement if there is commonality of interest and involvement in the contract.

27 Feb 2026

The appellant, LSS Ocean Transport DMCC, a company incorporated in UAE, filed an appeal against an order dated 16.10.2023 in Arb.O.P.No.(Comm.Div.) 19...

122 123 124 125 126

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)