Search Results for "Maharashtra Act 1961"

2192 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2192 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Surplus Land Declaration Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner Failed to Appeal Tribunal Order Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Within Reasonable Time.

The petitioner, Bhayyasaheb Babasaheb Aher, a resident of Umapur, Taluka Georai, District Beed, filed a return under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Agr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Surplus Land Declaration Under Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 — Petitioner Failed to Appear or Argue, No Merit Found.

The petitioner, Vishwanath s/o Narsing Sodgir, a resident of Gangakhed, District Beed, filed a writ petition challenging the declaration of surplus la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Validity of Appellate Side Rule on Marathi Translations After Earlier Division Bench Held It Unconstitutional. Larger Bench Examines Whether Litigants Were Heard Before Rule Declared Null and Void Under Article 348.

The matter arose from a writ petition filed by a practicing advocate who was prevented by the High Court Registry from filing a petition without first...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Group of Writ Petitions From Uniaided School Employees Seeking Pension and Service Benefits. The Petitioners Include Various Unions and Individuals Claiming Pension and Other Benefits Against the State of Maharashtra.

The case consists of a group of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The petitioners incl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Malafide Intent. Court held that the ingredients of Section 3(1)(r) of SC/ST Act were not made out as the alleged insult was not in public view and the relationship was consensual.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...