Search Results for "separate living"

1399 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1399 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Nullity of Marriage on Ground of Sapinda Relationship, Upholds Wife's Right to Maintenance. Marriage Not Void Ab Initio as Customary Exception Proved and Sapinda Relationship Not Established Beyond Doubt Under Section 11 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The parties, husband and wife, married in January 1981 and separated in July 1981. They lived in a joint family property in Girgaum. The wife filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Divorce Decree in Christian Marriage Dissolution Case Under Section 10 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869. Court upholds Family Court's decree dissolving marriage on grounds of adultery and cruelty, finding no legal infirmity.

The case involves a civil reference under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, where the Principal Judge, Family Court No.2, Pune, passed a dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Absence of Prima Facie Case. Allegations of Dowry Demand and Cruelty Under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act Fail as Complainant's Own Witnesses Turned Hostile and No Credible Material Existed.

The applicants, Wajidulla s/o Ibadulla, Javedullakhan s/o Ibadulla Khan, and Ahemadibegum d/o Subhankhan, filed an application under Section 482 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder and Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 498A, 302, 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty and murder beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Sections 498A, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants, Ankush Chandekar and Bayabai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay in Review Petition by Zilla Parishad — Unexplained Delay of 3 Years and 3 Months Not Condonable. Local Self-Government's Clumsy Decision-Making Process Not Sufficient Cause for Inordinate Delay.

The judgment concerns a Civil Application filed by the Chief Executive Officer, Education Officer (Primary), and Chief Account Officer of Zilla Parish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.678 OF 2014

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Appeal in Family Court Appeal No. 134 of 2006. Husband Found at Fault for Preventing Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Disentitled to Divorce Under Section 23(1)(a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai, dismissing the appellant-husband's petition for divorce under Section 13(1A) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Parsi Chief Matrimonial Court Holds That Evidence in Parsi Divorce Suits May Be Recorded Before a Commissioner Under CPC Order 18 Rule 4(2) — Section 46 of Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936 Does Not Mandate In-Court Recording with Delegates.

The case involved a suit filed under the Parsi Marriage & Divorce Act, 1936, by Rohinton Panthaky against Armin R. Panthaky. During the proceedings, a...