Search Results for "prior award"

4029 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4029 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Delayed Appeal for Land Compensation Parity — Interest Denied for Delay Period. Landowners under same acquisition entitled to same compensation as others, but interest denied for 2928 days delay.

The Supreme Court allowed a civil appeal arising from a land acquisition matter where the appellant's land was acquired for the construction of the Hu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Acquisition Notification for Petitioners' Land Due to Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. Notification held invalid for failing to specify the particular land and for not providing opportunity of hearing before declaration of slum area.

The petitioners, Yogesh Chandulal Mehta and Suresh Chandulal Mehta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Workman for Habitual Absenteeism in Industrial Dispute — Labour Court's Findings of Misconduct and Fair Enquiry Not Interfered With Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Dhananjay S. Kamodkar, was employed as an Operator with M/s. Motor Industries Company Ltd. (the respondent) from 1990. Between 1998 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Already Adequate. Market Value of Acquired Land at Rs.120 per sq.m. Was Higher Than Comparable Sale Instances.

The appellant, Jagdish Shriram Poddar, owned agricultural lands bearing survey nos. 22/1 and 22/4, area 1.51 HR, at Mouja Chichala, Wardha. For constr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over Dewatering Claims. Court sets aside majority award's rejection of dewatering claim for additional stretch, remits for fresh consideration.

The Petitioner, an Austrian contracting company, challenged a majority arbitral award dated 11 July 2007 that dismissed its claim for payment of dewat...