Search Results for "employee"

7203 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7203 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes of Management's Appeal Against Compensation Award in Labour Dispute Following Settlement. Parties Agree to Settle All Claims for Rs.10 Lakhs as Full and Final Settlement.

The Management of Ashok Leyland Ltd. filed a writ appeal before the Madras High Court challenging an order dated 16.08.2023 in W.P.No.14791 of 2017, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses University's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanent Status to Daily Wage Workers. Workers Employed for 240 Days Entitled to Permanency Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (an agricultural university) and its research station, challenged the judgment and order dated 08/08/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Peon Challenging Order of Deemed Abandonment of Service. Continuous Absence for Over Nine Years Without Sufficient Explanation Justifies Deemed Abandonment Under Rule 16(3) of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, Mustakimkhan Yawar Khan, was employed as a Peon at Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad Urdu High School, run by respondent no.1 Azad Education As...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence Not Proved. Deceased Auto Driver Died in Single-Vehicle Capsize; No Evidence of Third-Party Involvement or Negligence, Hence Employer and Insurer Not Liable Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased, Govindaraj, who died in a motor vehicle accident on February...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal for Correction of Date of Birth in School Records at Fag End of Service — Delay and Lack of Credible Evidence Lead to Dismissal. The appellant failed to prove his date of birth as 29-9-1959 and the suit was barred by limitation under Section 96 CPC.

The appellant, Sri B.S. Mahesha, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree d...