Search Results for "advocate withdrawal"

2004 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2004 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Extra-Judicial Confession and Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Chandrakant Digambar Tanksale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of Mohan, his cousin, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Extortion and Assault Case — No Prima Facie Case of Extortion Made Out as Demand Was for Genuine Dues. Applicant Accused Under Sections 384, 385, 323, 504, 506, 109, 114, 34 IPC Granted Bail as Allegations of Extortion Not Made Out.

The applicant, Santosh s/o Chabiladas Chaudahri, filed an application for regular bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. He was named as acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Challenge to Caste Scrutiny Orders in Service Matters. Petitioners Who Gave Up Challenge to Invalidated Scheduled Tribe Certificates Permitted to Continue in Service with Protection Against Recovery of Benefits.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by individuals who had secured employment based on their claim of belonging to a Scheduled Tribe. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal in Divorce Case — Concurrent Findings of No Cruelty or Desertion Upheld. Allegations Under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Not Proven.

The appellant-husband, Satish Dhudku Halnor, filed a second appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgment and decree dismiss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Award Upheld as Just and Proper. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs. 3,000 per month and Future Prospects Added at 40% Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenging the judgment and award da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute for Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain suit challenging acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as remedy lies before Reference Court under Section 18.

The appellants, owners of a property in Agonda, Goa, filed a suit seeking withdrawal from acquisition of their plots and compensation of Rs. 1,20,00,0...