Search Results for "Sale Price Determination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Sale Price Determination"

1239 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1239 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

10 Jul 2015

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CGIT Award Holding Canteen Contract as Sham and Bogus, Directs Absorption of Canteen Workers as Direct Employees of Principal Employer. Contract Labour Arrangement Found to Be a Mere Facade with Principal Employer Exercising Complete Control Over Workers, Making Them Direct Employees Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

26 Jul 2016

The petitioner, The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd., a public company, challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1 (CGIT...

Tribunals

NCLAT Larger Bench Holds Shareholder/Promoter is an 'Aggrieved Person' Under Section 61 IBC and Has Locus to Challenge Section 7 Admission Order. The reference resolves conflicting views on maintainability of appeal by shareholder against admission of insolvency petition.

30 Nov -0001

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai Bench, in a larger bench of three members, addressed a reference question: whether a share...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Interim Application in Share Dispute — Appointment of Arbitrator and Injunction Granted. Court holds that disputes regarding share transfer and oppression are arbitrable and appoints arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Kantilal Chhaganlal Securities Pvt. Ltd., filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Under Section 14(2) of Arbitration Act, Setting Aside Arbitrator's Termination of Proceedings for Delay in Filing Statement of Claim. Arbitrator's Refusal to Condoned Minimal Delay and Termination Held Arbitrary and Amounting to De Jure Inability to Act.

30 Nov 2017

The petitioners, original claimants in arbitral proceedings, filed a petition under Section 14(2) and Section 32(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's interpretation of partnership deed and findings on dissolution, holding that reappreciation of evidence is not permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Jun 2018

The petitioner, Yogendra N. Thakkar, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Software Implementation Dispute. Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked due to respondent's failure to appoint arbitrator under agreement dated 30 October 2015.

30 Nov 2018

The applicant, SAP India Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

1 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cenvat Credit on Capital Goods Allowed Even if Used for Exempted Goods Prior to Common Use. The court held that the restriction under Rule 3(4) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 does not apply when capital goods are used for both exempted and dutiable goods, and the assessee is entitled to credit if the goods are used in the manufacture of final products.

20 Jun 2018

The case involves appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Bengaluru, under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against orders of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts Under Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the company was commercially insolvent and unable to pay its debts, and appointed the Official Liquidator to take charge of its assets.

18 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...

121 122 123 124

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)