Search Results for "Magistrate's permission"

1861 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1861 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Dying Declaration Found Suspect as It Was Not in Question-Answer Form, Doctor Not Examined, and Toe Impression Appeared Unnaturally Clear Despite Extensive Burns.

The appellant, Smt. Karuna Ramteke, was convicted by the 2nd Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, in Sessions Trial 162 of 2003 for an offence pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Upholds Conviction of Appellant Under Section 304 Part I IPC for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder. Appellant convicted for causing death by knife injury, also convicted under Section 324 IPC for causing hurt by dangerous weapon.

The appellant, Shaikh Harun s/o Shaikh Hasan, along with his two brothers Shaikh Hussain and Shaikh Rafiq, were charged for offences punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition for Quashing of Criminal Case Involving IPC Sections 325, 427, 504, 506. Allegations Concern Voluntarily Causing Hurt, Mischief, Intentional Insult, and Criminal Intimidation.

This matter concerns a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Bombay by three petitioners, namely...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 Read with 34 IPC. The Appeals Challenge Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence, Including Decomposed Body Identification and Extra-Judicial Confession.

The appeals arose from a conviction by the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No. 246 of 1997, where the accused were found ...