Search Results for "Kerala Act"

4106 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4106 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.

The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Charges Against Doctor in POCSO Case for Failure to Report Sexual Offence — Mandatory Reporting Duty Under Section 19 of POCSO Act Applies Only to Persons Having 'Reason to Believe' Based on Concrete Information, Not Mere Suspicion.

The petitioner, Dr. Lata Krishnaraddi Mankali, a gynecologist and Chief Medical Officer at KLE's Society's Dr. Kamala Hospital, Ankola, was arrayed as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes One-Time Spectrum Charge on Cellular Operators for Spectrum Beyond 6.2 MHz, Holding No Statutory Power Under Telegraph Act, 1885 to Impose Retrospective Charges

The case involved a writ petition filed by major cellular mobile service operators, Bharti Airtel Limited and Vodafone Idea Limited, challenging the i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Commercial Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Appeal Questions the Upholding of Arbitral Award Granting Remuneration and Indemnity Under Reconstitution Deed of Partnership Firm.

The present Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Two-Year Separation Period Under Section 10A of Indian Divorce Act, 1869. Court holds that the provision is not discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution as the period is reasonable and based on legislative policy.

The petitioner, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad Disposes of Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 304 Part-II IPC; Examines Plea of Grave and Sudden Provocation

The appeal before the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad arose from the judgment and order dated 12.09.2001 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, P...