Search Results for "property title dispute"

4786 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4786 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Alleging Res Judicata and Patent Illegality; Decision on Coercion and Interest Awaited.

The petition challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner, a multi-state co-operative b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction. Notice under Section 351 of BMC Act, 1888 Held Valid as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title or Authorization.

The appellant, Namdev Pandurang Panchal, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a notice dated 19.10.2001 under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wakf Board's Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Dargah and Graveyard. Court Holds That Wakf Board Can Sue for Declaration and Possession Without Prior Notification Under Section 6 of Wakf Act, 1954, and That Adverse Possession Cannot Be Claimed Against Wakf Property.

The appellant, Maratwada Wakf Board, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment of the fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Deduction under Section 48(1) and Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as payments to sisters and nieces were for clearing overriding title and investment in REC bonds was within time.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Trial and Appellate Courts. Agreement to Sell Does Not Confer Ownership; Plaintiff Failed to Prove Payment of Consideration and Possession.

The appellant, original plaintiff, filed a Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Regular First Appeal No.964/2006 Against Dismissal of Permanent Injunction Suit. The Appeal Involves Dispute Over Possession of Land Allotted by Bangalore Development Authority to a Co-operative Housing Society.

The appellant, Telecom Employees Co-operative Housing Society Limited, a co-operative society, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeal Against Order Rejecting Impleadment in Suit for Specific Performance. Appellants Sought to Be Added as Co-Plaintiffs, Citing Interest in Property and Necessity for Complete Adjudication.

This appeal arose from the order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court rejecting Chamber Summons No.1334/2004, by which the appellants so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Title Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Appellant failed to prove title and possession; courts below correctly held that suit was barred by limitation and that revenue entries did not confer title.

The appellant, G.K. Shekharappa, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree...