Search Results for "block development officer"

1331 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1331 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Compassionate Appointment Due to Third Child Born After 2001. Clause-E of Government Resolution dated 28-3-2001 held constitutional and not violative of Article 14 as it promotes family planning.

The petitioner, Musaddique Ahmad Khan, is the son of a deceased Assistant Teacher, Muqaddar Khan Mumtaz Khan, who died in harness on 2 September 2015....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Club Membership Fees as Revenue Expenditure. Payment of entrance and subscription fees to Willington Sports Club held to be revenue expenditure, not capital expenditure, as it was for short-term membership renewal and did not create an enduring benefit.

The petitioner, Swiss Re Services India Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 29 March 2010 issued under Section 148 of the Income...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Society's Refusal to Grant Membership to Purchaser of Premises. Registered Sale Deed Holder Entitled to Membership Under Section 23(2) of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Despite Developer's Objection.

The petitioners, Apna Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Deputy General Manager, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Valid Reason to Believe in Income Tax Case. Failure to Disclose Material Facts Not Established as Petitioner Had Made Full Disclosure Under Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016.

The petitioner, Prabhakar Nerulkar, an individual engaged in real estate business, filed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Service Matter Challenging Withholding of Increments Without Enquiry. Major Penalty of Permanently Withholding Increments Requires Departmental Enquiry Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Narendra Motiram Bodkhe, an employee of Zilla Parishad, Wardha, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Punishment of Withholding Increments Without Departmental Enquiry. Punishment of permanently withholding two increments is a major penalty requiring a formal departmental enquiry under service rules.

The petitioner, Narendra s/o Motiram Bodkhe, a government servant, challenged the order dated 9.8.1994 passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Pa...