Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1855 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1855 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Petitions Challenging Cancellation of Tender by Western Coalfields Limited. Tender cancellation upheld as employer has discretion to cancel tender before issuance of purchase order, and no concluded contract exists.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by successful bidders challenging the cancellation of a global tender issued by Western Coalfields Limi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Arrest Order in BNSS and IT Act Case. Arrest Upheld as Police Complied with Mandatory Notice Under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and Procedural Safeguards, Despite Petitioner's Evasion and Refusal to Cooperate.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed by the petitioner, who was accused No.1 in Crime No.271 of 2025, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Plaint Must Contain Material Facts Constituting Complete Cause of Action; Mere Filing of Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff to Interim Relief.

The case involves an appeal against an order rejecting the plaint in a suit for specific performance. The appellants, who were members of an associati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Appointment of Court Receiver in Suit Challenging Transfer of Flat by Executors Before Probate. The court set aside the trial court's order appointing a Receiver and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of balance of convenience.

The appeals arose from an order dated 13 March 2014 of the learned Trial Judge in a notice of motion taken out by the plaintiffs in a suit seeking to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Appeal in Bank Recovery Suit — Guarantee Not Limited to Three Years, Liability Joint and Several. The court held that the guarantor failed to prove the alleged limitation of three years and is jointly and severally liable under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

The case involves a first appeal filed by Padmakar Krushnarao Bhagwatkar, who was the guarantor/defendant No.2 in a suit filed by the State Bank of In...