Search Results for "Evidence Closed"

3503 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3503 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction in Robbery Case: Offence of Robbery Under Section 390 IPC Not Made Out as No Grievous Hurt Caused or Attempted. The court held that for theft to become robbery, the offender must cause or attempt to cause death or grievous hurt, and mere tying up does not suffice.

The appellant, Dudhnath @ Ajay Baburam Harijan, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Sections 394, 450...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Police Sub-Inspector in Sohrabuddin Shaikh Fake Encounter Case — Applicant Not Named in FIR and No Overt Act Alleged. The court held that mere presence at the scene of conspiracy without any overt act does not constitute criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC.

The applicant, Shyam Singh Charan, a police sub-inspector from Rajasthan, was accused no. 9 in a case registered by the CBI for the alleged abduction ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Conviction in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Non-Examination of Complainant's Partner. Failure to Prove Debt or Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Complainant Firm Not Properly Represented.

The petitioners, Sidharth Narayan Siddhapur and M/s Taurus Earthmovers Limited, were the accused in a complaint filed by M/s Fluidmac, a partnership f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MCGM Contract Awards in Public Interest Litigation. Court Finds No Irregularity in Tender Process and Upholds Validity of Contracts for Road Works.

The present Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Jayshree Ramakant Khadilkar Pande challenging the award of four contracts by the Municipal C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Larger Bench Holds Shareholder/Promoter is an 'Aggrieved Person' Under Section 61 IBC and Has Locus to Challenge Section 7 Admission Order. The reference resolves conflicting views on maintainability of appeal by shareholder against admission of insolvency petition.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Chennai Bench, in a larger bench of three members, addressed a reference question: whether a share...