Search Results for "Article 102"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Article 102"

1700 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1700 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Confiscation of Vehicles and Timber Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Lack of Mens Rea and Bona Fide Possession Established. The court held that confiscation under Section 61-A requires proof of intentional violation of the Act, and where the owner had a valid transit pass and permission, the confiscation order was unsustainable.

4 May 2019

The petitioners, Syed Burhan Syed Nabi, Sk. Kadir Sk. Vazir, and Mahendra Anil Madipal, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Building Declared Dangerous and in Ruinous Condition. Court Held That Occupants Cannot Resist Demolition of Unsafe Building on Grounds of Pending Redevelopment or Ownership Claims.

22 Aug 2019

The petitioners, three occupants of a building called New Kisant Cooperative Housing Society in Mazgaon, Mumbai, challenged a notice dated 3rd July 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MHADA's Land Allotment for Housing Society Redevelopment Under MHADA Act, 1976. Court upholds MHADA's power to allot land and rejects allegations of illegality and lack of locus standi.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two petitions, Writ Petition No. 3 of 2013 filed by Shreeprakash Ramganesh Dube and Public Interest Litigation No. 27 of 2013...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed. Court held that no substantial question of law arose for interference under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

30 Nov -0001

The case is a second appeal arising from a suit for partition and separate possession filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents) against the origi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Apprentice Employees in Zilla Parishad — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Termination of apprentices without inquiry or notice held illegal as they were 'workmen' under the Act.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by 21 individuals who were engaged as apprentices by the Zilla Parishad, Wardha, under the Appre...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Pension Benefits to Retired Bank Employee Despite Delay in Deposit of Amount Under Joint Note. The court held that the three-day condition imposed by the bank was arbitrary and unreasonable, and that the petitioner's substantive right to pension could not be defeated by a procedural technicality.

18 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar, joined the Bank of Baroda as a subordinate staff member on 4 March 1967 and retired after 39 years of unblemi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Settlement Commission's Majority Decision Rejecting Settlement Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case. Majority view prevails over minority view under Section 127I of the Customs Act, 1962 when there is a difference of opinion among Members.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioners, Under Water Services Company Limited and others, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Assault Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Civil Nature of Dispute. FIR under Sections 323, 324, 341, 427, 504, 506 IPC quashed as allegations were vague and the dispute was civil.

22 Apr 2024

The petitioners, C. Ganesh Narayan and Vidya Nataraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section ...

120 121 122 123 124

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)