WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019
19 Dec 2019...
Search Results for "service continuation"
2027 result(s) found
Found 2027 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Cooperative Bank Director Due to 18-Year Delay. Inordinate Delay Violates Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21 of Constitution, Proceedings Quashed as Abuse of Process.
2 May 2005The petitioner, Bimal V. Bhatt, was one of the directors of the National Cooperative Bank Ltd. and was arraigned as accused no.2 along with his father...
- 94
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Decree to Correct Name of Judgment Debtor and Sets Aside Attachment of Third Party's Property. Decree holder permitted to amend arbitration award and decree to substitute 'M/s. Sarju International' with 'M/s. Sarju International Ltd.' as the correct judgment debtor; attachment of bank account and property belonging to the third party applicant set aside as they were not the judgment debtor.
9 Sep 2005The judgment concerns two chamber summonses arising out of an execution application. The first chamber summons was taken out by the decree holder, M/s...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.
6 Sep 2005The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows MBBS Admission Under Hilly Area Reservation for Student Who Studied in Adjacent Hilly Tahsil. The court held that the requirement of studying in a hilly area is satisfied if the student studied in any hilly area, not necessarily the same village, and directed the State to grant admission.
20 Aug 2013The petitioner, Shubham Borekar, a resident of Semadoh, a hilly area in Amravati district, applied for MBBS admission under the hilly area reservation...
- 182
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Against Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Employee's claim of continuous service after nationalization fails as termination occurred prior to vesting.
11 Aug 2006The petitioner, Ravindra Gopal Shinde, was employed as a helper with Kohinoor Mills Company Limited. On 18th October 1983, the management of the cotto...
- 148
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against School Tribunal for Failure to Consider Rule 27(e) of MEPS Rules in Retrenchment Case. The court remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the Tribunal to address the specific ground of non-compliance with Rule 27(e) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981.
30 Nov 2006The petitioner, Kiritkumar B. Vasave, challenged the judgment and order dated 8-5-2003 passed by the School Tribunal, New Mumbai, in Appeal No.44 of 2...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Denying Locus Standi to Employees in Reference Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Individual Workmen Have No Independent Right to Prosecute Reference but Industrial Court Must Exercise Discretion to Hear Them if Interests Affected.
6 Nov 2006The petitioners, employees of Empress Mills Retail Sales Division, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th October 1995 which held that...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal Order Setting Aside Termination of Clerk. Petitioner-Management Succeeds as Tribunal Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Entering into Merits Without Considering Preliminary Objection Regarding Maintainability of Appeal.
21 Dec 2006The petitioner, Santosh Baliram Dalvi, the Secretary of Vasant Dada Patil Shikshan Sansthan (Respondent No.2), challenged the judgment and order dated...
- 122
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
20 Nov 2025The petitioners, Balasaheb Lalasaheb Jadhav and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Co...
- 89
