SUIT (L) NO. 204 OF 2017.
16 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "prior finding binding"
2526 result(s) found
Found 2526 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Maintainability of Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC and Examines Plaintiff’s Readiness and Willingness in Suit for Specific Performance of Agricultural Land Sale Agreement; Trial Court Had Dismissed Specific Performance but Directed Refund of Advance with Interest
3 Mar 2015The appeal arose from the judgment and decree dated 27.09.2014 in O.S. No.1/2011 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Tiptur, partly decreeing t...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Interception Orders of Petitioner in Indian Telegraph Act Case Due to Absence of Public Emergency or Interest of Public Safety. The Court Held That Telephone Interception Without Proper Statutory Compliance Violates Right to Privacy and Intercepted Material Must Be Destroyed.
22 Oct 2019The petitioner, a businessman, challenged three orders dated 29 October 2009, 18 December 2009, and 24 February 2010, by which his telephone calls wer...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Due to Pending Title Dispute. Availability of Alternate Civil Suit Remedy Renders Writ Petition Under Article 227 Not Maintainable.
21 Nov 2024The petitioner, M/s. Blue Heaven Co-op Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orde...
- 1663
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Addresses Caste Certificate Verification and Affinity Test in Scheduled Tribe Claims Under Maharashtra Act. The Court examines procedural guidelines and the role of affinity tests in determining caste claims, referencing prior judicial directives and legislative frameworks.
24 Mar 2023The dispute centered on the verification of caste certificates for Scheduled Tribes in Maharashtra, involving procedural guidelines and the role of th...
- 400
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Co-owner's Possession. Court holds that possession of one co-owner is possession of all co-owners unless there is ouster, and that the trial court and first appellate court erred in not considering this principle under the Limitation Act, 1963.
30 Nov -0001The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession and declaration of title filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the...
- 163
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquitted Accused's Writ Petition for Rs.200 Crore Compensation as Acquittal Does Not Automatic Entitlement. The Court Holds That Compensation Under Article 226 Requires Proof of Malicious Prosecution and Violation of Fundamental Rights, Not Mere Acquittal.
5 May 2017The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was filed by the peti...
- 38
High Court
Bombay High Court Heard Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Refusal of Interim Relief in Land Development Dispute. Dispute Involved Conditions Precedent in Memorandum of Understanding and Effect of Revival of Show Cause Notice on Title to Leased Land.
23 Jul 2025The judgment text provided contains the factual background and context of a commercial arbitration petition filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Possession and Title. Co-owner in possession cannot be dispossessed except by due process of law; decree for possession based on title is maintainable.
10 Apr 2023The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant (Rakesh Engineering, through its proprietor Chandrika Mohan Sharma) against the judgment...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Enforcement of Singapore Anti-Suit Order in NCLT Oppression and Mismanagement Dispute. Court holds that disputes under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 are non-arbitrable and exclusively triable by NCLT, and that an anti-suit injunction from a foreign court cannot be enforced in India to prevent a party from pursuing statutory remedies before the NCLT.
11 Sep 2023The plaintiff, Anupam Mittal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking an anti-anti-suit injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing an ...
- 74
