KAHC010218752018_1
20 Sep 2021...
Search Results for "statutory notice requirements"
3693 result(s) found
Found 3693 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Dispute Over Time Charter Agreement — Holds That Time Charter Is a Service Contract, Not Transfer of Right to Use Goods. The Court ruled that a time charter does not involve transfer of possession or control, thus not taxable under Section 5C of Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957.
4 Dec 2019The appellant, The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd., owned a tug named 'Kumari Tarini' and entered into a Time Charter Agreement dated 8.1.1998 with th...
- 205
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for MHADA Land Allotment to Government Employees' Cooperative Housing Society — Directs State to Process Proposal Within 12 Weeks. The court held that prolonged delay in allotting land to a society of High Court employees violates their right to housing under Article 21 of the Constitution and the MHADA Act, 1976.
15 Sep 2023The petitioner, Milind Dashrath Narvekar, is the chief promoter of a proposed cooperative housing society named 'Shri Ganesh Sai High Court Employees�...
- 96
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Quo-Warranto Petitions Challenging KPSC Appointments, Upholds Executive Power Under Article 316. Court Rules That Article 316 is a Complete Code and No Rules are Required for Appointing Chairman and Members of the State Public Service Commission.
27 Jul 2023Two public interest litigations were filed by Shashi Prasad Gandhi and T. Narasimhamurthy challenging the appointments of the Chairman and members of ...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of GPSC Recommendations for Junior Scale Officer Posts. The Court Examined Whether the Cabinet Decision Was Arbitrary and Violative of Constitutional Guarantees.
21 Dec 2012The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging a Cabinet decision of the Government of Goa. The dis...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Vice-Chancellor of Pune University; Holds No Violation of Prescribed Qualifications. Court Finds that Petitioner Failed to Prove That Incumbent Lacked Essential Qualifications Under the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.
21 Apr 2010A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Dr. Prabhakar J. Lavakare challenging the appointment of Respondent No.4, ...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Challenge to MahaRERA Adjudicating Officer Order in Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Matter. Petition Filed Under Article 226 Seeking Quashing of Compensation Order on Ground of RERA Registration Exemption for Part Occupancy Certificate Phase.
1 Mar 2021The matter concerned a challenge under Article 226 of the Constitution to an order of the Adjudicating Officer, Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Aut...
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Developer in Redevelopment Dispute — Restrains Cooperative Society from Terminating Letter of Intent Pending Arbitration. Termination of Development Agreement Found Prima Facie Invalid Under Section 9 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
16 Dec 2021The petitioner, Kalpataru Ltd, a real estate development company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Affirming Removal of Mathadhipathi under A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. Leave granted in SLP against dismissal of challenge to removal based on enquiry report finding charges proved.
1 Jan 1970The appeal arose from the removal of the Mathadhipathi of Sri Swamy Hathiramji Mutt, Tirupati, under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious...
- 78
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Third-Party Shop Owners Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Commercial Construction on Residential Plot. U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad's Demolition Order Upheld as High Court's Directions for Removal of Illegal Construction and Initiation of Criminal/Departmental Proceedings Are Affirmed.
10 Dec 2024The case involves appeals by third-party purchasers of commercial shops constructed on a residential plot originally allotted to Veer Singh by U.P. Av...
- 4385
