Search Results for "interim order modification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "interim order modification"

1276 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1276 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 9 Petition for Interim Measures in Commercial Matter. Arbitration Act, 1996 invoked for pre-arbitral relief in a contractual dispute.

6 May 2025

This petition, filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, sought interim measures from the Bombay High Court. The petitioner...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Sports Quota Admission Case Due to Belated Challenge and Lack of Candor. The Court upheld the final rank list published on 28.06.2019 as the basis for admission, rejecting the appellant's plea to shift a candidate from Individual to Team category.

5 Sep 2019

The appellant, Jyothir R, challenged the categorization of Respondent No. 5, Sujithraj U. Mallan, under the Sports (Individual) category instead of Sp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Challenge to Property Tax Assessment on Leased Premises. Held that the liability to pay property tax under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 is on the occupier, and the insurance company as lessee is liable to pay taxes directly to the corporation.

21 Oct 2013

The petitioner, The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., a Government company under Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition for Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute. Court holds that disputes regarding possession of flats by dissenting members are not arbitrable under the agreement and that the developer failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief.

10 Feb 2016

The petitioner, Aditya Developers, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a Court Rece...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute — Clause 27.4 Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, Third Party Not Bound. The court appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the petitioner and respondents 1 to 4 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but dismissed the petition against respondent No.5 who was not a party to the agreement.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Clause 27.4 of Agreement Held Valid Arbitration Agreement, but Third Party Respondent No.5 Cannot Be Referred to Arbitration.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Nitesh Urban Development Pvt Ltd, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitions for Admission to ESIC Medical Colleges Under 15% All India Quota — ESIC Cannot Restrict Quota to Its Own Insured Persons. The court held that the 15% All India Quota in ESIC medical colleges must be filled from the national merit list as per MCI Regulations, and ESIC cannot restrict it to children of insured persons under the ESI Act, 1948.

24 Sep 2013

The petitioners, who are students seeking admission to MBBS courses in ESIC Medical Colleges, challenged the eligibility criteria imposed by the ESIC ...

High Court

High Court Allows Professor's Petition Challenging Chancellor's Order Voiding Nomination to Board of Studies in Maharashtra Public Universities Act Case. Nomination Under Section 40(2)(b)(ii) Held Valid as Petitioner is a 'Teacher' Under Section 2(44) of the Act.

14 Oct 2020

The petitioner, Dr. Shankar Bhagwan Ambhore, a Professor and Head of Department in Economics at Smt. Dankunwar Mahila Mahavidyalaya, Jalna, was nomina...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator Mandate Due to Expiry of Time Limit Under Arbitration Clause — Failure to Complete Arbitration Within Stipulated Period Results in Termination of Arbitrator's Authority. The court held that the mandate of the arbitrator stood terminated under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the arbitration was not completed within the time limit prescribed in clause 21 of the agreement.

1 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Teltech Instrumentation Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 14(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Violation of Natural Justice. Arbitrator's failure to consider vital evidence and crucial documents renders award patently illegal and liable to be set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Nov 2025

The appellant, M/s Leaf Bio-Tech Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Ci...

118 119 120 121 122

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)