Search Results for "contradictory statement"

1662 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1662 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish common intention and actual attempt to cause death.

The case involves an appeal against the judgment and order of the II Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Trial No. 83/2004 dated 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Mother-in-law and Sister-in-law of Abetment to Suicide in Dowry Harassment Case. Conviction under Section 498A IPC Upheld for Husband and Relatives for Cruelty and Dowry Demand.

The case pertains to the death of Rekha, who was married to Prashant Puttewar (appellant no.1) on 13/05/2001 and resided with her husband, parents-in-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Dowry Demand. Conviction under Sections 302, 304B, 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove dowry demand and cruelty leading to suicide.

The appellants, Sopan Bhausaheb Gunjal (husband), Sitabai Bhausaheb Gunjal (mother-in-law), and Bhausaheb Kisan Gunjal (father-in-law), were convicted...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Motive Found Insufficient to Convict Accused Under Sections 302, 147, 148, 201, 436 IPC and Explosive Substance Act, 1908.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 28th March 2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia, in Sessions Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Beneficiaries in Trust Petition — Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Applies. Court holds that persons claiming beneficial interest under a trust are necessary and proper parties to a trust petition under Section 41A of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the petitioner, Harishchandra Amarnath Puri, in a Trust Petition (No. 1 of 2017) pending before the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of four appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against DRT Order in Debt Recovery Case — Bank Entitled to Recover Debt Under RDB Act. DRT Has Inherent Power to Reject Frivolous Counterclaim Without Recording Evidence, and High Court Should Not Interfere When Alternative Remedy of Appeal Exists.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Fin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Orders Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act for Forcible Dispossession. Plaintiff Proved Prior Possession and Forcible Ouster by Defendant with Armed Men, Entitling Him to Summary Remedy Without Proof of Title.

The plaintiff, Om Nath Chudamani Sharma, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of possession of Flat No. ...