Search Results for "Void transfer"

1983 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1983 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses HUDA's Appeal in Plot Allotment Additional Price Demand Case. Demand for Additional Price Not Permissible Under Allotment Conditions as There Was No Enhancement in Land Cost by Competent Authority Under Land Acquisition Act.

The case involves a dispute between Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) and an allottee, Jagdeep Singh, regarding the demand of additional pric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Evacuee Property Tenancy Dispute — Tenancy Claim Invalid Without Custodian's Approval. Amending Act 19 of 1989 applies only to tenancies created by Custodian, not to claims based on deemed tenancy under Section 4 of Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964.

The dispute concerns property known as 'Conde-Mayem' in Goa, originally owned by Eurico de Soza Joquem Noroana, declared evacuee property after libera...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Not a Sham Transaction. Appellant failed to prove that sale deed dated 3.2.1975 was without consideration or a sham document; concurrent findings of courts below upheld.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Shashikant Haribhau Bandewar (appellant-plaintiff) and Bhalchandra Haribhau Bandewar (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Agreement for Sale of Open Amenity Space by Municipal Corporation to Private Developer. Municipal Corporation Cannot Alienate Public Amenity Space Reserved Under Development Plan Without Following Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The petitioner, Prashant Bhagwantrao Palande, a resident of Mira Road, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Remands for Fresh Consideration on Limitation. The appellate court's dismissal of suit as barred by limitation was set aside as it failed to consider the plaintiff's case that refusal occurred on 30 March 1972, not 31 March 1972.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff (now represented by legal heirs) against the judgment of the District Court, Solapur...