KAHC010028192013_1
26 Sep 2014...
Search Results for "wrong rule"
4924 result(s) found
Found 4924 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash and Negligent Driving Causing Death of Five Persons in Truck-Car Collision on Bombay-Pune Highway. Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Sections 279, 304(A), 338 IPC and Motor Vehicles Act, Holding That Prosecution Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
22 Dec 2006This judgment arises from a criminal revision application filed by the original accused, Mohammed Sannaulla Gausmuddin Amir Sab, challenging his convi...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction order under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 must show application of mind and failure to do so vitiates prosecution.
20 Feb 2020The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of the respondent (original accused) by the Special Judge, Pune, for offences under Sec...
- 90
High Court
High Court of Bombay Quashes Prosecution Under MRTP Act Due to Limitation Bar — Non-Compliance with Demolition Notice Held Not a Continuing Offence. The Court held that offence under Section 53(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, is complete upon failure to comply with notice within prescribed period, and the mere continuance of unauthorized construction does not keep the offence alive for purposes of limitation under Section 468 Cr.P.C.
12 Feb 2013The petitioners, who were accused in a criminal case under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, challenged the rejection of their ple...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Redevelopment Dispute; Developer Challenges Directions to Amend Building Plans and Pay Compensation. Court's Decision Awaited.
13 Jan 2026The dispute pertained to redevelopment of a cooperative housing society's property. The respondent society, owner of a plot in Andheri, Mumbai, appoin...
- 27
High Court
Karnataka High Court Quashes Government Order Cancelling Mining Leases for Non-Existent Quarrying Leases — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind. The impugned order cancelled quarrying leases under Section 4(1A) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rule 8(1) of Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994, but petitioners held only mining leases, not quarrying leases.
24 May 2021The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Ganapathy Granite Impex Pvt Ltd. and Sri Janardhan Naik challenging an order dated 20.06.2018 p...
- 83
High Court
High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Petitions Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Interim Deposit Order. The Arbitral Tribunal Had Directed Joint and Several Deposit of Rs.190 Crores and Restraint on Property Alienation.
3 Jan 2019The dispute arose from a Share Holders Agreement (SHA) dated 27 December 2012 and subsequent amendments between the Claimants (investors) and the Resp...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Prevention of Black Marketing Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Court also directs inquiry into custodial violence allegations and awards compensation of Rs. 5,00,000 for violation of fundamental rights.
17 Oct 2006The petitioner, Bhaurao s/o Punjabrao Gawande, a businessman dealing in transportation of petroleum products, challenged his detention order dated 27....
- 75
Supreme Court
Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.
12 Apr 2012Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...
- 56
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.
23 Oct 2019This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...
- 248
