Search Results for "valuation procedure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "valuation procedure"

1125 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1125 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Partition Suit Valuation Dispute — Court Fee Payable Under Section 6(iv)(d) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 on Market Value of Plaintiff's Share. Suit for partition and possession of agricultural land valued at Rs.4,60,000/- held to be properly valued under Section 6(iv)(d) and not under Section 6(iv)(ha) of the Act.

29 Jul 2010

The petitioner, Sau. Asha Sopan Maithane, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 02.09.2009 passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Kha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRAT Order Confirming Sale of Company Property in Favour of Auction Purchaser. Workers' Dues and Alleged Irregularities Do Not Justify Annulment of Concluded Auction Sale Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

20 Sep 2011

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Damages. Court fees are not payable on a tentative claim at the initial stage when the exact valuation is to be adjudicated later, as per Section 7(i) of the Court Fees Act, 1870 and Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

16 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a suit filed by the respondent, a retired government officer and advocate, against the State of Punjab and its officers for rec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

30 Jul 2013

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Declaration of Ownership — Rejection of Plaint Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Properly Refused as Plaint Discloses Cause of Action. The trial court's refusal to reject the plaint was upheld because the plaint disclosed a cause of action and issues of limitation and valuation were mixed questions of fact and law.

4 Jun 2015

The petitioners, who were the defendants in the trial court, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at ₹90 per Square Metre. Comparable Sale Deed with Escalation and Deduction for Development Charges Applied Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

31 Aug 2017

The case arises from an appeal by the original applicants (legal heirs of Pandu Y. Kubal) seeking enhancement of compensation for land acquired by the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interlocutory Order as Not Maintainable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Order Rejecting Permission to File Fresh Valuation Report Is Not an Interim Award and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 34.

30 Aug 2018

The dispute arises from a Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) dated 22.12.2003 between Dilip Timblo (appellant) and Prashant Timblo (respondent). The appel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order in Partition Suit — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC. The court held that the trial court's discretion to reject the application for reopening evidence was judiciously exercised and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.

23 Feb 2018

The petitioners, who are defendants in a partition suit (O.S. No. 56/2006) pending before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC at Chickballapur, filed a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Dismissal Order in Commercial Suit — Suit Not Barred by Arbitration Clause as Reliefs Are Not Covered by Arbitration Agreement.

1 Feb 2024

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the applicants/defendants challenging the order dated 03.02.2023 passed by the Commercial Court at...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Challenging Rejection of Plaint Return in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that valuation of suit for purposes of jurisdiction is determined by the market value of the property, not the consideration amount, and that the trial court's finding on valuation is a finding of fact not liable to interference in revision.

23 Jan 2023

The judgment arises from two Civil Revision Applications challenging a common order dated 22.04.2022 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior D...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)