Income Tax Appeals by Wipro Limited and Revenue Against Orders of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore for Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005
25 Mar 2015...
Search Results for "turnover requirement"
334 result(s) found
Found 334 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India Decides Revenue Appeal Against Tribunal's Order on Excise Valuation of Fiat Cars. Assessee's Price Below Cost Held as Normal Price Under Section 4(1)(a) by Tribunal, Revenue Challenges on Ground That Price Did Not Reflect Manufacturing Cost and Profit.
1 Aug 2026The dispute concerned the valuation of Fiat Uno model cars for central excise duty under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The assessee, M/s ...
- 121
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Software Export Tax Exemption Case — ITAT's Factual Findings on Export Turnover and Profit Computation Upheld. The court held that no substantial question of law arose under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the ITAT's findings were factual and based on evidence.
12 Feb 2014The case involves three appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appell...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court examines maintainability and delay condonation in appeals filed by State under Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The dispute pertained to taxation of kerosene used as feedstock and returned stream after extraction of N-Paraffin under an agreement between Reliance Industries Limited and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited.
22 Mar 2018The matter involved a batch of petitions challenging orders of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. Reliance Indus...
- 69
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Revenue's Appeals Against ITAT Decision Favoring Assessee on Deduction of Distributable Surplus Payment to Brand Owner. Court Examines Whether Payment is Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 or Constitutes Application of Income or Diversion by Overriding Title.
25 Sep 2018The present set of five tax appeals arises under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Incom...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in DEPB Taxation Case - Face Value of Duty Entitlement Passbook Chargeable Under Section 28(iiib) at Accrual, Excess Over Face Value Under Section 28(iiid) at Sale. The court held that the Tribunal erred in holding that the entire sale proceeds of DEPB are not profits under Section 28(iiid) and that face value should be deducted from sale proceeds.
28 Jun 2010The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arose from a decision of the Special Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribun...
- 87
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Agricultural Marketing Board Rules for Preferential Allotment to Displaced Dealers. Conditions of Three Years Licensing and Minimum Turnover of Rs.5 Lakhs Held Valid and Not Violative of Article 14.
16 Oct 2019The case involves appeals against judgments of the Punjab and Haryana High Court concerning the validity and interpretation of the Punjab State Agricu...
- 185
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.
1 Jan 1970The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tender Award for Rabies Vaccine Supply. Performance Certificate Not in Prescribed Proforma Held Directory, Not Mandatory, as Substantial Compliance and Public Interest Justify Award.
3 Sep 2012The petitioners, Bharat Biotech International Ltd, challenged the grant of a contract by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) for the su...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge by L-2 Bidder to Tender Qualification of L-1 Bidder in Underground Cable Conversion Work. Petition alleges that rival L-1 bidder did not meet mandatory tender conditions and that tendering authority's decision was arbitrary and irrational, invoking principles of judicial review in public procurement.
10 Mar 2023Bombay High Court addressed a writ petition filed by Universal Cables Ltd., the L-2 bidder, challenging CIDCO's decision to declare BNC Power Projects...
- 11
