Search Results for "tenant purchaser"

521 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 521 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Due to Fraud and Leasehold Rights | Asian Chemical Industries Case (2026)

The Bombay High Court, in M/s. Asian Chemical Industries v. Vijay Kailas Industrial Premises CHS Ltd. & Ors. (Writ Petition No. 11164 of 2024, dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Shop; Adverse Possession Claim Rejected Under Limitation Act.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellant, who is the grand-daughter-in-law of the original plaintiff Gangabai Gilda. The suit property...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Tenant at will cannot claim adverse possession; suit for possession based on title is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for permanent injunction and possession filed by the original plaintiffs (now respondents) against the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Eviction Petition Under Hyderabad Tenancy Act — Landlord's Bona Fide Need for Personal Cultivation Not Established. Appeal Allowed as Tenant Failed to Prove Landlord's Lack of Bona Fide Need Under Section 98 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950.

The petitioner, Kisan Sayaji Shelke, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) at Aurangabad, which all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...