Search Results for "tax refund taxation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "tax refund taxation"

151 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 151 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Property Tax Dispute Due to Jurisdictional Defect in Notices. Notices Issued Under Sub-Section (12) of Section 108A of Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976, Were Quashed as Conditions for That Provision Were Not Satisfied, and Authority Could Not Justify Action Under Different Provision.

19 Feb 2026

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a partnership firm challenging property tax notices issued by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Non-Compliance of DRP Directions Within Statutory Time Limit Under Section 144C(13) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Failure to Complete Assessment Within One Month of Receiving DRP Directions Renders Transfer Pricing Addition Time-Barred and Non-Est.

10 Oct 2025

The Petitioner, Archroma International (India) Private Limited (formerly Huntsman International (India) Private Limited), filed a Writ Petition under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Income Tax Act — Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit and Without Proper Sanction Is Invalid. Reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 quashed as time-barred and sanction under Section 151 not by competent authority.

28 Mar 2024

The petitioner, a foreign company, challenged a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2016-...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant's Appeal Against High Court's Jurisdiction Finding in GST Notification Challenge. High Court of Sikkim Lacked Territorial Jurisdiction as Cause of Action for Challenging Goa's GST Notification Arose in Goa, Not Sikkim, Under Article 226(2) of the Constitution.

14 Mar 2023

The dispute originated from writ petitions filed before the High Court of Sikkim by a private limited company engaged in the lottery ticket business, ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Notification Levying Central Excise on Tobacco Products — Notification No.3/2019-Central Excise dated 06.07.2019 held valid and within powers under Section 5A of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court held that the government has the power to modify or withdraw exemptions in public interest and that promissory estoppel does not apply to legislative functions.

21 Sep 2022

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by manufacturers and dealers of tobacco and tobacco products, challenging Notification No.3/2...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Consultancy Fees Received Abroad by Non-Resident Not Taxable in India. The court held that the assessee, a non-resident rendering services outside India, was not liable to tax on consultancy fees received abroad under Section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Nov 2015

The appellant-assessee, Sri Salil Punoos, was employed by M/s Best Foods Asia Ltd., Hongkong as Managing Director from 1997. During the relevant perio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act Despite Retrospective Amendment After Assessment Order. Commissioner Must Consider Retrospective Amendment as Law Deemed to Exist on Date of Assessment Order.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Kalpesh M. Nagda, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2003-2004 on 25 November 2003, declaring total income of Rs.48,22,312...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference on Depreciation Rates but Upholds Revenue's Disallowances on Travel Expenses, Medical Reimbursement, Motor Car Perquisite, and Rent as Capital Expenditure. The Court held that depreciation under Section 32 must be allowed at rates as amended from 2.4.1983, while affirming that employee travel expenses after destination are disallowable under Section 39 read with Rule 60, medical reimbursement is part of salary under Section 40(c), actual expenditure on motor cars for directors is to be considered, and rent of Rs.16,91,250/- is capital expenditure.

18 Sep 2012

This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.5873/Bom/8...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Upfront Appraisal Fee Taxability Case. Upfront appraisal fee charged by a non-resident statutory company for evaluating loan applications is held to be taxable as income under the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it is not a reimbursement of expenses but a fee for services rendered.

9 Jul 2012

The case involves an appeal by the Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)