Search Results for "take notice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "take notice"

16582 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16582 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for De-reservation of Land Reserved for Children's Playground Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period Results in Lapsing of Reservation. Purchase Notice Under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 Held Valid Despite Power of Attorney Not Being Registered, as Original Owners Ratified the Action.

22 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Gopal Kashinath Lad (Kele), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that his land, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petitions for Deemed Lapse of Land Reservations under MRTP Act. Court Considers Whether Purchase Notices Served on Appropriate Authority Under Section 49 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Were Valid.

12 Mar 2019

The two writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a declaration that the reservations imposed on the petitioner...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Restriction on Import of Colour Picture Tubes and Video Tape Deck Mechanisms. Court Examines Whether Public Notice No. 109/89 Dated 21 March 1989 Renders Imports Under Pre-Issued Additional Licences Invalid.

13 Dec 2017

The petitioners, manufacturers of colour televisions, imported Video Tape Deck Mechanism (VTDM) and Colour Picture Tubes (CPTs) against additional lic...

High Court

KAHC010059832012_1

21 Jun 2016

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Continues Ex-Parte Injunction in Copyright and Trademark Infringement Suit Over ATYATI Device Mark. The Court found no suppression by the Plaintiff and held that the Defendants' adoption of a deceptively similar logo without explanation warranted continuation of the injunction.

30 Apr 2024

The present suit was filed by the Plaintiff, a company engaged in IT solutions, alleging infringement of its copyright in the ATYATI device mark, infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

6 May 2014

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

3 Dec 2015

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

1 Jan 1970

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Release of Seized Gold Due to Non-Issuance of Notice Under Section 124 of Customs Act, 1962 Within Prescribed Period Under Section 110(2). The court held that continued seizure beyond six months without notice under Section 124 is illegal and directed release of gold.

22 Apr 2015

The petitioner, K. Abdulla Kunhi Abdul Rahaman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnatak...

10 11 12 13 14

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)