PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.66 OF 2003
21 Nov 2006The public interest litigation was filed by a journalist challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtra under Section 37 of the Maharashtra Regi...
Search Results for "suo motu initiation"
266 result(s) found
Found 266 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Bar Council Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction in Professional Misconduct Complaint — Complaint Filed by Judgment Debtor Against Decree Holder's Advocate Not Maintainable Under Section 35 of Advocates Act, 1961
7 Jun 2024The petitioner, Sri Paras Jain, an advocate practicing in Bengaluru for 44 years, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...
- 125
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petitioner-Society’s Challenge Against Rejection of Grant-in-Aid for Special School. Court Considers Whether School Eligible for Grant Despite Government Resolution 2024 Requirement.
29 Jul 2026The writ petition was filed by Shri Swami Samarth Bahuddeshi Sanstha, Vairag, a society running a special residential school for children with disabil...
- 10
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dowry Harassment and Abetment of Suicide Case — Evidence of Cruelty and Abetment Insufficient. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside due to unreliable dying declaration and lack of proof of instigation.
28 Feb 2020The appellant, Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Davangere, in Sessions Case No.11/2009 for offences under Secti...
- 148
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Managing Committee Members in Co-operative Housing Society for Violation of Section 78A MCS Act — Disqualification for One Term Upheld. The court held that the Deputy Registrar's order removing petitioners from managing committee and disqualifying them for one term was valid as they failed to comply with statutory requirements under Section 78A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
21 Feb 2025The petitioners, members of JVPD Sterling CHS Ltd., challenged orders dated 13th January 2023 passed by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, ...
- 2874
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Quashing Charge Memo Due to Delay and Quasi-Judicial Functions. The Court Held That Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated After 8 Years for Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duties as Income Tax Officer Were Unjustified and Caused Prejudice to the Employee.
13 Feb 2013The Union of India and others filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Central Admini...
- 95
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Multiple Matrimonial Dispute Cases Based on Compromise. Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC Used to Quash Non-Compoundable Offences Where Settlement is Genuine and Voluntary.
6 Jun 2023The judgment involves four separate criminal applications and two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, seeking quashing of...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Private Complaint Against Former Chief Minister for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 19 PC Act. Sanction for prosecution of public servants is mandatory and absence of valid sanction renders complaint not maintainable.
21 May 2013The petitioner, a former Chief Minister of Karnataka, sought quashing of a private complaint filed by the respondent before the XXIII Additional City ...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Revision in VAT Limitation Case — Revisional Order Passed Beyond Three-Year Period. Tribunal Correctly Held That Suo Motu Revision Under Section 63-A(3) of KVAT Act Must Be Completed Within Three Years from Date of Assessment Order, Not from Initiation of Proceedings.
26 Aug 2015The State of Karnataka filed revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) challenging an order of the ...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Initiates Suo Motu Contempt Against Prison Superintendent for Wilful Disobedience of Emergency Parole Orders. Superintendent Selectively Applied Binding Precedent Under Rule 19(1)(c) of Maharashtra Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 2020, Refusing Release to 35 Eligible Prisoners While Granting Parole to 6 Ineligible Ones.
16 Mar 2022The Bombay High Court at Nagpur initiated suo motu contempt proceedings against Shri Anupkumar M. Kumre, Superintendent of Central Prison, Nagpur, und...
- 49
