Search Results for "summary criminal remedy"

434 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 434 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Maharashtra Revenue Services (Recruitment) Rules, 2020 and Directs Finalization of Seniority Lists for Deputy Collectors — Seniority to be Determined by Date of Continuous Officiation, Not by Date of Regular Promotion.

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Deputy Collectors and the State of Maharashtra concerning the determination of seniority o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Maintenance to Second Wife in Section 125 CrPC Case Despite Void Marriage Due to Husband's Deception. Husband Cannot Deny Maintenance on Ground of Invalidity of Marriage When He Concealed Prior Marriage.

The petitioner, Mrs. Alka Bhausaheb Bhad, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to ISP in Section 9 Arbitration Application, Restraining OTT Platform from Suspending Internet Services to 22,000+ Subscribers. Court holds that MOU creates binding obligations and balance of convenience favors continuity of services pending arbitration.

The applicant, World Phone Internet Services Pvt. Ltd. (WPISPL), a Delhi-based Class A Unified License ISP, filed an application under Section 9 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Recovery Proceedings and Civil Imprisonment Order for Non-Payment of Dues. Recovery Officer's Order for Arrest and Detention of Defaulter Under Section 28A of SEBI Act, 1992 Upheld as Valid Exercise of Powers.

The petitioner, Vinod Hinigorani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of orders dated 18.12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Awards Compensation for Custodial Death in Jail Lockup Shooting by Constable. State Held Vicariously Liable for Acts of Employee Under Article 21 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Kewalbai, mother of Sandeep, filed a Criminal Writ Petition seeking compensation of Rs. 10,00,000/- for the custodial death of her son...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Discharge of Accused in Cheque Bounce Case Despite BIFR Proceedings. The court held that an order under Section 22 of SICA does not automatically bar criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, Harshad Jayprasad Bakshi, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the order of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 12th Court, Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Despite Dismissal for Default — Magistrate Has Inherent Power to Restore Complaint Dismissed Under Section 256 CrPC

The applicant, Ramdas Bhagwan Bankar, filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against respondent no.1, K...